Kinetiq switched on the public Elysium testnet on September 22, moving its Hyperliquid focused Layer 2 from a design thesis into a live developer network. The immediate consequence is bigger than another EVM sandbox: Elysium uses HYPE for gas, settles through HyperEVM, and is designed to route half of future sequencer revenue toward KNTQ purchases and burns. Yet the feature that could make the chain genuinely differentiated, low latency contract access to HyperCore's books, is not part of the initial launch. That gap now defines the trade.
For related opportunities and eligibility updates, explore AirdropHotList's latest airdrop listings.
The testnet makes Kinetiq's scaling claim measurable
Elysium's open testnet is running under chain ID 99801, with a public RPC and a live block explorer producing blocks and indexing contracts. It uses Arbitrum Orbit's Nitro and ArbOS stack, is operated with Conduit, and targets real canonical blocks every 100 to 200 milliseconds. Kinetiq is aiming for 300 million gas units per second of execution capacity, although its documentation says that target must still be validated through load testing before mainnet.
The comparison that matters is not simply Elysium against other fast chains. It is Elysium against HyperEVM, whose small blocks carry 3 million gas every second, alongside larger 30 million gas blocks every 60 seconds. Those constraints help HyperEVM remain connected to HyperCore, but they leave limited room for sustained market making, rapidly refreshed quotes and other high frequency workloads.
Elysium's answer is to add a faster application layer without exporting activity to an unrelated ecosystem. Solidity and Vyper contracts can deploy with standard tools including Foundry, Hardhat, viem and ethers. HYPE remains the gas asset, and the chain is intended for spot AMMs, proprietary market maker AMMs, automated strategies, lending and structured products rather than one narrowly defined application.
DeFi campaigns can involve protocol usage, liquidity, staking, or wallet activity. Before spending gas or locking funds, compare more DeFi airdrops and review the effort-to-reward balance.
The architecture keeps new liquidity inside Hyperliquid
The most consequential design choice is the bridge path between Elysium, HyperEVM and HyperCore. According to Kinetiq's token bridging documentation, HYPE moves from HyperEVM to Elysium as native gas on a one to one basis. HyperEVM tokens can enter through a canonical bridge, while assets launched on Elysium can be mirrored onto HyperEVM and eventually linked to HyperCore spot markets.
That creates a potential token lifecycle contained within the Hyperliquid ecosystem: launch and bootstrap liquidity on Elysium, mirror the asset to HyperEVM, graduate to a HyperCore spot order book and potentially add a perpetual market through HIP 3. The investment case is therefore not just cheaper transactions. It is whether Elysium can become an origination layer for assets and applications that later generate trading activity elsewhere in Hyperliquid.
The critical limitation is timing. Elysium launches on standard ArbOS, while its native HyperCore market data precompile and ElysiumCoreWriter are scheduled for a network upgrade approximately four weeks after mainnet. Those additions are intended to let contracts read order books, prices, balances and positions with roughly 150 to 350 milliseconds of freshness, then submit trade intents to users' HyperCore accounts in about 100 to 200 milliseconds. Until that upgrade is deployed and tested, Elysium has speed and bridging, but not its complete HyperCore integration.
Still unsure about wallets, eligibility, or reward rules? Visit our FAQ page for quick answers before joining any new crypto campaign.
HYPE becomes the operating asset while KNTQ captures fees
For HYPE, the direct mechanism is utility. Developers and users need HYPE to pay Elysium gas, with no separate network token required. If Elysium attracts applications and capital from outside Hyperliquid, it could also create more opportunities for arbitrage between its AMMs and HyperCore order books. That may turn Elysium activity into additional HyperCore volume and fees, although this remains an adoption thesis rather than guaranteed value accrual.
KNTQ has a more explicit economic link. Kinetiq's published sequencer allocation assigns 50% of Elysium sequencer revenue to open market KNTQ purchases, 25% to builders whose applications consume blockspace and 25% to the Kinetiq treasury. Tokens purchased through the KNTQ allocation are intended to be sent to the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund address, making them unavailable to the market.
The arrangement produces a useful investor paradox: HYPE is the asset required to operate the chain, while KNTQ is designed to capture a larger direct share of its sequencer economics. The two tokens benefit through different mechanisms, and neither mechanism matters without genuine application demand.
Kinetiq had already purchased 5,391,458 KNTQ at an average price of $0.15 by September 16, representing about 2.15% of the circulating supply reported at that time. Its KIP 5 policy redirected future protocol funded purchases away from sKNTQ stakers and toward permanent supply reduction. Elysium could expand that buyback engine, but only after the network generates meaningful sequencer revenue.
Not every reward campaign deserves your time. Before you commit, compare this opportunity with our active airdrops list and focus on campaigns with clearer upside, better trust signals, and realistic participation steps.
The launch still carries familiar rollup risks
Elysium begins with a single sequencer and permissioned validation. Its AnyTrust data availability committee stores full transaction data while compact certificates are posted to HyperEVM, with full data posting used as a fallback if the committee becomes unavailable. Kinetiq's security documentation outlines eventual permissionless fraud proofs through Arbitrum BoLD, but that decentralization is a future step rather than a launch feature.
The testnet also cannot prove that liquidity will follow infrastructure. Fast blocks may attract automated deployments, farming behavior or short lived experiments without producing durable markets. Mainnet parameters remain subject to revision, and the delayed HyperCore read and write upgrade introduces additional execution risk.
Airdrop users should make another distinction. Kinetiq's public materials confirm an open testnet and an economic allocation for successful builders, but they do not announce an Elysium token, points campaign or retroactive user reward. Testnet participation can help evaluate the network, but it does not create a verified claim on a future airdrop.
Conclusion: Elysium has launched the test, not proved the thesis
Elysium gives Hyperliquid a credible attempt at something it currently lacks: a high throughput EVM environment engineered around its own liquidity rather than loosely bridged to it. The live testnet confirms that the base chain, RPC and explorer exist. It does not yet confirm that traders, market makers and developers will create the activity needed to benefit HYPE or activate KNTQ's sequencer revenue loop.
The next evidence should come from four signals:
- Applications generating sustained blockspace demand rather than one time testnet transactions.
- Meaningful HYPE, stablecoin and token liquidity entering through Elysium's bridges.
- The HyperCore read and write upgrade shipping with the promised latency and reliable callbacks.
- Observable sequencer revenue translating into builder funding and KNTQ purchases after mainnet.
If those signals arrive, Elysium could become Hyperliquid's missing application layer. If they do not, it will remain a technically fast chain waiting for the market structure that was supposed to make its speed valuable.
Kryvora Network
Note Systems
Nado
Gaming Platforms
Crypto Casinos
Blockchain Bridges
Staking & Restaking
DEX Token Swapping
Crypto Wallets